most recent 30 from http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com 2013-05-22T22:32:40Z http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/feeds/user/1733 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/5600/bug-life-cycle-with-qa-testing-cycle jseminara 2010-10-27T21:24:21Z 2010-10-28T01:41:46Z

<p>I'm trying to build a semi-complicated workflow that was designed by a QA specialist. The workflow follows a typical developer cycle with the developer ending his responsibilities at FIXED. </p> <ol> <li>Developer finishes work and marks FIXED automatically assigns the bug to the QA dept who will immediately take action and begin testing. <li>QA marks TESTED if the bug was actually fixed or <ol><li>QA marks REOPENED to reject and send back to Dev. </ol> <li>QA marks VERIFIED <li>Release Manager marks RELEASED which closes the bug. </ol> <p>I'm not sure if I'm going down the wrong path here, can someone check my sanity? Do I need QA plugin?</p>

http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1518/workflow-setup/1523#1523 jseminara 2010-10-27T21:00:59Z 2010-10-27T21:00:59Z

Could you elaborate on this? I'm testing a seemingly complicated workflow: 1: developer FIXes, (automatically assigned to QA dept) 2: QA tests and marks as TESTED or REOPENED (bug not fixed) 3: QA marks VERIFIED 4: Release Manager marks RELEASED I'm having an issue in trying to make this work within the two-tiered active/resolved paradigm and I'm hitting a wall. any help?