Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? - FogBugz Knowledge Exchange most recent 30 from http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com 2013-05-21T20:44:26Z http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/feeds/question/1603 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1603/dear-fb-plugin-developer-user-community-what-would-you-like Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? Jude Allred 2010-01-25T21:07:10Z 2010-05-01T15:32:10Z <p>Fog Creek likes plugin developers. They're awesome! Anything we can do to help facilitate growth in that community is generally well worth it for us.</p> <p>Tim asked, "<a href="http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1585/can-we-have-a-discussion-page-wiki-for-possible-plugins-and-related-apps-for-fb" rel="nofollow">Can we have a discussion page/wiki for possible plugins and related apps for FB</a>?"</p> <p>If that means a dedicated FogBugz site for you to share (even if just the wiki), or a dedicated SE site... absolutely! Comment appropriately if you want that, and I'll get it done. This hasn't happened yet because we weren't sure it was wise-- FogBugz.SE seems most important. If you just need a front end, you can always use one of our free 2-user On Demand accounts.</p> <p>There are also things like <a href="http://fogbugzplugins.uservoice.com/" rel="nofollow">http://fogbugzplugins.uservoice.com/</a>, which provide some types of feedback and community interaction which StackExchange isn't yet capable of. As SE evolves, it may completely eclipse uservoice for our purposes, but that is yet to happen. The <a href="http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1158/poll-what-are-your-top-plugin-requests" rel="nofollow">plugin requests poll</a> is an experiment to see if SE can beat out uservoice for our needs... The jury is still out. It's a little awkward that both exist simultaneously.</p> <p>We haven't taken a lot of initiative on this, since we suspected that a superior way might emerge organically from the community, however we're open to nudging people toward a set of best practices via website text, etc.</p> <p>So, the question is:</p> <p>What do you think Fog Creek should do to best strengthen the FogBugz Plugin community?</p> http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1603/dear-fb-plugin-developer-user-community-what-would-you-like/1604#1604 Answer by Jude Allred for Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? Jude Allred 2010-01-25T21:07:30Z 2010-01-25T21:07:30Z <p>We at Fog Creek had envisioned that FogBugz.SE could eventually provide you with all that you need-- plugin developers could have tags for their plugins and generally be owners of all questions with those tags, thus providing support, getting feedback, making announcements, etc. This has the advantage of automatically making the plugin community visible to the FogBugz user community. Ditto for general FogBugz ecology.</p> <p>E.g., I might have a question entitled 'URL Trigger Plugin", tagged 'plugin' and 'plugin-url-trigger', I would keep it updated with the most recent news on URLTrigger, and I could gather feedback on URLTrigger via that mechanism. I'd generally monitor FogBugz.SE for anything containing my URLTrigger tag, and thus gather bug reports and provide support via SE. Some of this behavior has already emerged on its own, such as the 'workflow-plugin' tag, etc.</p> http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1603/dear-fb-plugin-developer-user-community-what-would-you-like/1606#1606 Answer by Tim for Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? Tim 2010-01-25T22:41:04Z 2010-01-25T22:41:04Z <p>Do you share customer requests for features that you have chosen NOT to pursue (with related metrics on the request (how many customers, frequency, last asked, etc))?</p> http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1603/dear-fb-plugin-developer-user-community-what-would-you-like/1607#1607 Answer by JohnFx for Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? JohnFx 2010-01-26T00:07:45Z 2010-03-11T18:47:40Z <p><strong>FBOD Approval Process</strong><br> The approval process for making plug-ins available on FBOD could use some improvement. </p> <p>The amount of time it takes to get new or updated plug-ins approved and posted is highly unpredictable. I wouldn't mind the wait so much if I had a better idea of what to expect in terms of turnaround time. </p> <p>Also, there needs to be an expedited approval process for patches to plug-ins that are already approved/hosted on FBOD. A bug was found that didn't adjust dates to the user's local time in my FNN plug-in (it happens) that required a one line fix. However, I wound up apologizing to users of the plug-in for longer than I would have liked while I waited for approval.</p> <p><strong>Plug-In Gallery</strong><br> I understand the reasons that the download count is not displayed for a plug-in until it reaches a certain threshold, but if I am logged in as the plug-in author I think it should show me the number no mater how anemic. </p> <p>It would also be nice for me to be able to see how many FBOD users have enabled my plug-in on their hosted accounts, which isn't currently included in the download counter.</p> <p>Lower importance, but also useful would be an enhancement to the gallery to allow plug-in users to vote/review/comment on the plug-ins. </p> <p><strong>Wiki Plug-in API</strong><br> I'd like to hear from some other plug-in authors on this, but I find this particular API really hard to understand compared to the other parts of the API. Despite <a href="http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBugz/Plugins/plugin.aspx?ixPlugin=31" rel="nofollow">releasing a plug-in</a> that uses it, I still feel like I BARELY grok how it is supposed to work I still feel like I am fumbling around in the dark when working with it compared to the ease of the other API interfaces. The half-finished documentation on this part of the API doesn't help much either.</p> <p><strong>And the obvious</strong><br> Keep improving the programming and plug-in APIs. There have been a number of plug-ins that I started, but later abandoned because the API simply doesn't yet provide the hooks I need.</p> http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1603/dear-fb-plugin-developer-user-community-what-would-you-like/1820#1820 Answer by JohnFx for Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? JohnFx 2010-02-07T03:18:24Z 2010-02-07T03:18:24Z <p>It would be nice to be able to submit a plug-in for FBOD approval directly from the page on the plug-in gallery after you upload it rather than having to send a separate e-mail to request approval.</p> http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/questions/1603/dear-fb-plugin-developer-user-community-what-would-you-like/2399#2399 Answer by JohnFx for Dear FB Plugin Developer/User Community: What would you like? JohnFx 2010-03-11T15:02:21Z 2010-03-11T15:02:21Z <p>In the error e-mails that FogBugz sends to the plug-in author when the plug-in throws an error, it would be really nice if it included also the following information:</p> <ul> <li>Version of FogBugz </li> <li>FBOD or self-hosted. </li> <li>Hosting platform (DB Server, Web Server, Web Server OS)</li> </ul>